32 diodes

I was thinking about the series blocking diode addition to my recent solar panel purchase:

https://wb9kzy.blogspot.com/2026/04/make-or-buy.html

Certainly there is a drop across the diode when the panel is charging, less than 250 mV with low current.  But is it really needed ?

Looking at the solar panel itself again there are 6 wafers, each wafer has 6 groupings of photodiodes with 6-5-5-5-6 diodes each or 32 total diodes in series.

count the wider horizontal dark lines to determine the number of solar cells

  Per Wikipedia the output voltage of a silicon solar cell (diode) is .5 to .6 volts.  Multiply 32 diodes times .56 volts gets to roughly 18 volts which is about the rated voltage:



21.6 volts divided by 32 is .675 volts so this sounds reasonable for a no-load situation.

Now since the panel is charging a lead acid AGM / gel-cell battery the highest voltage that the battery could apply to those 32 diodes is roughly 13 volts:



source: https://voltagebasics.com/lead-acid-battery-state-of-charge-voltage-chart/


So unless more voltage is applied, not that much current should flow until the "knee" of the diode IV curve is reached, right ?  If we assume an even voltage drop across the diodes: 13 volts / 32 diodes = .41 volts across each diode.  Unfortunately we don't have the IV curve for forward conduction on the solar panel.

Enough talk, this requires measurements !  I waited until dark, then covered the panel just to make sure that no light was present.  Then I shorted the diode and measured the leakage current through the solar panel.  The battery voltage was 12.9 volts (measured via Morse code with the DC Beeper kit, see:
 
 
the leakage current was 5.2 mA.  

With the diode back in series the leakage current was .083 mA:


5.2 divided by .083 => about 63 times as much leakage with a direct connection - bottom line:  keep the diode in there at least for now.
I should also check the other solar panel for leakage, it may or may not have a series diode.

Best Regards,
Chuck, WB9KZY
http://wb9kzy.com/ham.htm

 

Comments